Nairobi (HAN) 5 April, 2012 , – Public Diplomacy and Regional Security and stability Initiatives News. Al-Shabaab fighters Divided and in retreat, the question is whether Al-Shabaab’s death throes will drag Somalia into another cycle of violence?
According to the comments of the Chancellor of Mogadishu based, the Somali Institute of Security and Diplomacy (SIRAD), “The militant group in southern Somalia is under pressure from African Union troops, the Somali national army and a covert of American drones-Sharpening the Weapons of Peace.”
Ground battles with African Union forces have decimated Al-Shabaab’s rank-and-file, while U.S. drone strikes and Special Operations raids have killed some of the group’s leaders.
According to Simon Tisdal (theguardian), there was a time when al-Shabaab, Somalia’s largest and most notorious Islamist militia, inspired fear and awe across that ravaged land. But the group’s latest terror attack, on the national theatre in Mogadishu, is a sign of weakness, not strength. Al-Shabaab is divided, under pressure and in retreat. The question now is whether its death throes may drag Somalia into another cycle of violence and killing.
A turning point came last autumn with Kenya’s military intervention in the south, provoked by a series of kidnappings and border incidents. African Union (AU) forces had already expelled al-Shabaab from most of Mogadishu in August. The Kenyans, backed by Ethiopian troops, challenged the group’s control of south and central Somalia, and it has been on the back foot ever since. AU reinforcements are now on the way.
Al-Shabaab has responded with a spate of sporadic, indiscriminate and strategically incoherent attacks in which many civilians have been killed. It has mounted assaults on the transitional federal government in Mogadishu, on targets inside Kenya (Mombasa was hit last weekend) and in semi-autonomous north-eastern region of Puntland, where its displaced fighters appear to be seeking a new foothold.
The international conference on Somalia hosted by Britain in February made clear that western powers and their African partners were determined to keep up the pressure. New UN sanctions have meanwhile been imposed on Eritrea’s anti-western regime, a chief sponsor of al-Shabaab’s campaign to expel all foreign forces and create an Islamic state in Somalia ruled by sharia law.
The militia’s decision this year to formally enlist with al-Qaida seems to have backfired, crystallising internal divisions. It united moderate local and regional forces against them, and persuaded Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, the spiritual leader of Somalia’s Islamists who merged his forces with al-Shabaab in 2010, to openly challenge the group’s military leadership at the weekend.
“The unprecedented outburst from Aweys might just mark [the point at which] the previously unified movement began to unravel,” said commentator Simon Allison. “‘Wake up and open your eyes,’ Aweys said on a public radio station … al-Shabaab’s use of violence and oppression to ensure obedience was a tactic Aweys described as mirroring the treatment meted out by hated dictator Siad Barre. And he questioned al-Shabaab’s claim to a monopoly on jihad.”
Allison pointed out that Aweys is no ordinary cleric, but rather a man of immense personal authority who is more of a Somali nationalist than a jihadi zealot. “That pitted him against the faction led by Ahmed Abdi Godane, who also goes by the pseudonym Mukhtar Abu Zubeyr. He’s angling to be al-Qaida’s main man in east Africa and was behind the al-Shabaab-al-Qaida merger last month”.
Aweys and his allies within al-Shabaab’s leadership have hinted at a negotiated settlement. That is anathema to the hardliners around Godane. Their answer has been to step up random terror attacks, like that in Mogadishu on Wednesday, to make a deal impossible.
Aweys gave a rare interview to the Guardian in 2008 in the Eritrean capital of Asmara, in which he jokingly called himself Somalia’s Thomas Jefferson. He said he wanted an Islamic republic, but his primary objective was to have all foreign forces leave. “Every country has the right to fight for its freedom. If the United Kingdom was invaded, would the British people not fight the invaders?” he asked.
Fair and balanced mediation by the international community would be acceptable but it was currently not on offer, he said. The US and proxies such as Ethiopia were pursuing their own interests, which made peace unattainable. Four years on, Aweys may be about to try again.
HAN & Geeska Afrika Online (1985-2015), the oldest free independent Free Press in the region, brings together top journalists from across the Horn of Africa. Including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Sudan, Djibouti, South Sudan, Uganda, Kenya, Oromo, Amhara, Somali, Afar and Harari. Plus, we have daily translations from 150 major news organizations in the Middle East and East African regions. Contact at email@example.com